Choice words

Choice Words: Matt Ennion, head of collective research at Quilter Cheviot

On what makes a great manager and knowing when to take on risk – in markets and in cricket

In our regular video series, we interview the wealth sector’s key decision-makers to discover how they think about life, both within the world of investment and beyond it; what brought them into the business and what keeps them here; and what makes them and their companies tick

Manager quality sits at the heart of good fund selection, maintains Matt Ennion, head of collective research at Quilter Cheviot, when asked what he most looks for in an individual investment – and what stands out as a potential ‘red flag’.

“We are fund investors and so we do a lot of research in funds – and there are obviously a lot of key things you have to look for,” he tells Wealthwise editorial director Julian Marr in the above video. “For me, though, it all comes down to the quality of the fund manager running the portfolio.

“So it is about really getting under the skin of the manager and understanding how detailed they are and how well they know their companies. And not just knowing the companies but understanding where the value is in those companies and how you can realise that value over the long term – and then being really proactive in trying to drive that.”

We want fund managers who understand not just where the value is in their companies but how they can realise that value over the long term – and who are then really proactive in trying to drive that.”

As for investment red flags, Ennion highlights the potential risks of funds enjoying strong growth on the back of market trends. “One example would be in the growth markets pre-Covid, where there were a lot of funds that performed well – often on the back of perhaps newer fund managers you may not have heard of,” he explains.

“Then, after a couple of years of performance, people were out there, saying, This is a really good fund – but you just have to question how much of that is pure beta and they are just looking to raise capital or whether there is a bit of alpha in there as well. And our job, obviously, is to pick that up – what is driven by momentum and what is driven by real alpha generation?”

Opportunity cost

Later on, the conversation turns to investment mistakes and the lessons learned. “There are lots of funds you pick that you think are good at the time – and are genuinely good funds – but perhaps they don’t work for whatever reason,” Ennion begins. “So whether that is actually considered a mistake, I don’t know – some people would say so; others not.

“For me, though, mistakes are more around opportunity cost – so doing the work but not actually investing, not committing capital, not having the conviction and then missing out on return. In that respect, I have been around long enough to go back to the Euro crisis – just after the global financial crisis – and at that time I remember sitting in investment committees at a different business, not Quilter.

“We had been sitting on cash and gold, which had done us pretty well for a period of time – so performance was OK but the problem was just getting capital back into the market. Month after month, the data would look terrible and you would think the right thing to do was stay in cash. But then, in 2011-ish, the market started to rally ahead of all the data turning – and we would sit in cash and not necessarily commit.

“So you are then giving back a lot of your outperformance – and that would be when you learn a lot about how difficult asset allocation is; how economies and markets are not the same thing; and how trying to time markets is incredibly difficult. I suppose, ultimately, you learn about trying to stay invested – that it can be just a few days in the market that account for a lot of returns. And, if you’re not invested, you miss them.”

A full transcript of this episode can be found after this box while you can view the whole video by clicking on the picture above. To jump to a specific question, just click on the relevant timecode:

00.00: What excites you about the current investment outlook? What worries you?

02.21: What do you most look for in an individual investment? What constitute ‘red flags’?

04.15: To what degree should professional investors be thinking beyond so-called ‘traditional’ investments? Towards what?

06.26: What drives your approach to client communications?

07.32: What was your path into investment – and, if you hadn’t taken it, what do you think you would be doing now?

09.15: What was the biggest investment mistake you are prepared to admit to – and what did you learn from it?

11.14: Outside of work, what is the strangest thing you have ever seen or done?

12.51: What are your best and worst-case scenarios for the future of wealth in the UK?

14.23: What advice would you have given your younger self on your first day in this business?

15.23: Two ‘Choice Words’ recommendations, please – one a book; one a free choice?

Transcript of ‘Choice Words’ Episode 10:

Matt Ennion, with Julian Marr

JM: Well, hello and a very warm welcome to another in our series of ‘Choice Words’ videos where we get the chance to speak to key decision-makers in the world of UK fund research and fund selection. I am Julian Marr, editorial director of Wealthwise Media, and today I am delighted to be talking to Matt Ennion, head of collective research at Quilter Cheviot. Hello Matt.

ME: Hello, Julian.

JM: Let’s jump into my first question – a two-parter – what most interests you or excites you about the current investment outlook? What gives you pause for thought? [EDITOR’S NOTE: This interview was recorded shortly before ‘Liberation Day’.]

ME: Thanks, Julian – thanks for asking me along. It is a really volatile market out there at the moment so, as usual, there is a lot to a lot to worry about. But one area that particularly excites us – and it is an area of the market we are slightly overweight in with our portfolios at the moment – is emerging markets and Asia as well. We have just come back from a research trip over in Asia and it is really noticeable how positive the environment is out there, how dynamic the economy is and how things are really moving forward.

That is not something you would necessarily get from the commentary you read over in this country. Speaking to a lot of fund managers out there as well as people on the street, however, the consumer is very confident and the shops are busy and full, with queues out the door. And, speaking to fund managers, a lot of businesses are really taking hold of AI and that is feeding in and making them a lot more efficient. So there is real positivity out there and, given where valuations are – and in China, particularly – it is a really interesting area.

Counter to that, on the more worrying side, I suppose domestic UK just looks quite troublesome at the moment from an economic perspective. And within that and, I think, UK smallcap – as much as they are cheap and have been for a long time and we have seen some level of takeover activity there – it feels difficult, over the next six or 12 months, to really get excited about what is going to drive that forward. Even though, longer-term, potentially there is some good value to be had there.

JM: Thanks for that. And as the co-author of the 2011 ‘classic’ Investing in Emerging Markets: the Bric Economies and Beyond – available now in all good skips behind second-hand bookshops – I am delighted to hear that first part of your answer.

Realising value

JM: Moving swiftly on, what do you most look for in an individual investment? And what do you see as red flags?

ME: We are fund investors and so we do a lot of research in funds – and there are obviously a lot of key things you have to look for. For me, though, it all comes down to the quality of the fund manager who is running the portfolio. So really getting under the skin of the manager and understanding how detailed they are and how well they know their companies. And not just knowing the companies but understanding where the value is in those companies and how you can realise that value over the long term and being really proactive in trying to drive that.

A good example would be someone like Alex Savvides, who obviously used to work at JO Hambro and has recently started at Jupiter. I have done a lot of work with him over the years and he really has got that depth of knowledge – and it is reflected in the performance he has generated over the long term. So that would, for me, be a real key focus, when we are picking funds.

In terms of red flags, again, there are a lot of things you look for – you know, style drift and things like that. But one thing that worries me a little is around momentum funds and funds that are growing on the back of trends. An example would be in the growth markets pre-Covid, where there were a lot of funds that performed well and often on the back of perhaps newer fund managers you may not have heard of.

And then, after a couple of years of performance, people were out there, saying, This is a really good fund, with a good manager – but you just have to question how much of that is pure beta and they are just looking to raise capital or whether there is a bit of alpha in there as well. And that is our job, obviously – to pick that up. But that is one real red flag area for me – what is driven by momentum and what is driven by real alpha generation?

Useful diversification

JM: Good answer – thank you. Totally unconnected, of course, I am going to move to on to something that has been driven by momentum and marketing departments – to what degree should investors – and, by extension, those who advise them – be looking beyond so-called traditional investments such as bonds and equities and into more alternative arenas? And are there any alternative arenas you are looking at?

ME: Yes, it is an area of focus for me. I cover private equity and infrastructure – we largely use the investment company sectors to get exposure there – and I certainly think professional investors should be using those spaces. It is not necessarily for all clients – and, of course, we need to understand what clients’ needs are ultimately.

Still, I think diversification is really important and so some exposure to absolute return funds or infrastructure or private equity – those sorts of sectors – is useful at times within portfolios. Certainly, if we see drawdowns, something like an absolute return fund can be quite helpful. Admittedly, some of those have not always worked particularly well but, with the research team we have, we have selected some good ones there. So that has certainly been helpful for some of our clients at times when it has been needed.

Thinking specifically, private equity is obviously an area that has grown over the years. It is a market that has been around for 30 or 40 years, really – so relatively new – but it has grown significantly to a trillion-dollar industry now. And a lot of businesses are staying private for longer – you hear that all the time – so gaining exposure to some of those top-quality companies is important for clients.

Now, clearly there are trade-offs between the type of structure and how you access the investments there – and also liquidity. Clearly, some of those investments are not so liquid. So you have to understand if clients can withstand some of those risks. Still, it is certainly a market where there are new structures potentially coming through and so we are doing a bit of work there to understand the impacts of those and how they may take hold. Certainly it is an area we should be exposing clients to – where it is the right thing to do.

Idea generation

JM: Let’s move onto client communication. Quilter Cheviot has been pretty hot on this for some years now – and I am not just saying that because you are in the room! – but what drives your approach to client communication personally? Is there anything you brought from your previous job to this one?

ME: It all comes back to trying to meet client needs, ultimately – you know, trying to help clients move through their investment journey and deliver on the outcomes they require. We do have a big research team, which obviously does a lot of work and can generate good ideas for clients and put portfolios together for clients.

And we then work quite extensively with the investment management team and the adviser team – we go out and talk to clients to try and help them understand some of the investments they are making, the investment environment and, ultimately, what do they need to do they need to do to meet their requirements? So we work quite closely with those teams to try and help achieve that within Quilter Cheviot.

Second innings

JM: Excellent. A more personal question now – what was your path into investment and, in a parallel universe, if you had not taken it, what do you think you would you be doing now?

ME: I don’t know what I would be doing now! But it was pretty much straight out of university. I went to Liverpool University, studied economics there, came out and wasn’t quite sure what to do. I didn’t really know too much about the financial industry, to be honest! I spent a year in Australia playing grade cricket and, having come back from that, I got the opportunity to take a graduate role – at Quilters, actually, in Liverpool.

I spent two or three years up there – learning the investment management role, effectively, and about the industry as a whole. So that was a really good sounding-board for the role and understanding the broader market itself. And then I moved down to London in, I think it was, 2000 and here I am today, back at Quilters – a lot more focused than I was that first time! – in the head role of collective investment. So that is my career.

What I would have done prior – I don’t know. I guess, in terms of the crossroads of that period when I chose to join Quilters, I was playing a lot of cricket – and playing at a reasonable level. So, at that point, I suppose I could have gone and tried to make something out of that. It was something I was thinking about at the time – I am not sure I would ever have been a superstar or anything like that but it was a certainly an option. And, whether that had gone well or not, I don’t think I’d still be playing today!

JM: Well, that is fascinating to hear – especially as an utterly mediocre cricketer! And if you play grade cricket in Australia and you survive to tell the tale, then you have done pretty well. It is a good standard.

Opportunity cost

JM: Now I want to ask about the biggest cricket mistake you ever made – but let’s stick to the script! What is the biggest investment mistake you are prepared to admit to? And what did you learn from it?

ME: It is a difficult question. There are lots of funds you pick that you think are good at the time – and are genuinely good funds – but perhaps they don’t work for whatever reason. So whether that is actually considered a mistake, I don’t know – some people would say so; others not. For me, perhaps, mistakes are more around opportunity cost – so actually doing the work but not actually investing, not committing capital, not having the conviction and then missing out on return.

In that respect, I have been around long enough to go back to the Euro crisis – just after the financial crisis – and I remember sitting in investment committees at that time. This wasn’t at Quilter – this was a different business – and we had been sitting on cash and gold and that had done us pretty well for a period of time.

So performance was OK – but it is just getting that capital back into the market. Trying to time that was very difficult and you would sit in committees, month after month, and the data would look terrible – and you would think the right thing to do was stay in cash. But then, in 2011-ish, the market started to rally ahead of all the data turning – and we would sit in cash and not necessarily commit.

So you are then giving back a lot of this outperformance and so I suppose, in terms of learning, that would be a time when you would learn a lot how difficult asset allocation is; how economies and markets are not the same thing; and how trying to time markets is incredibly difficult. And I suppose, ultimately, you learn about trying to stay invested – because it is that old statistic, isn’t it? You know, it is those few days in the market that account for a lot of returns – and, if you’re not invested, you miss them.

JM: And that takes us back to the communications point and just making sure the client is along with you for the whole journey. And I think, in investment, a mistake is only a real mistake if you keep on making it. You can make it the first time as long as you move on – if it is part of the process, then it is a problem.

Unsafe hands

JM: OK, this is the oddest question I ask but there you go – outside of work, what is the strangest thing you have ever seen or done?

ME: I’ll go back to cricket. It may not seem that strange but, as a cricketer, it felt strange at the time. I was playing club cricket at a decent level and, in one team, there was always a batsman who would come out and not wear any batting gloves – and, when you think about it today, pretty much everyone wears helmets and protection and they are padded up.

Yet they would always come out and bat without batting gloves – they would have the pads on, but no gloves. And, having been a batsman and broken numerous fingers – even with gloves – you know, it put you on edge as a fielder just watching it. Because obviously, in club cricket, you get some decent bowlers and some quick bowlers – but he didn’t actually ever break any fingers.

JM: Maybe he was extra motivated by the lack of protection! Did you ever ask him why he did that?

ME: No – I think it was just the fact that it felt comfortable – he didn’t feel comfortable wearing gloves. It was restrictive and, as I say, he never actually broke any fingers. So maybe it was motivation not to get injured – but it was quite an interesting one and I’ve never seen anyone else do it before or since. It was very unique situation.

JM: It is like that thought experiment on how the best way to make everyone drive safely is not to worry about signs or road markers but to have a big spike on the steering wheel as that tends to concentrate the mind on driving carefully – maybe that was his view! So fair enough – that counts. Well done!

Cultural necessity

JM: Back to the day job now, what do you see as the best and worst-case scenarios for the future of wealth in the UK?

ME: Well, it is a pretty topical subject, isn’t it? I suppose, in terms of best case, it is largely around making investment a part of the culture – and certainly, at a younger age, educating people to invest and really look after their own financial futures.

And that ultimately, I suppose, comes back to government policy, regulation, tax – all those sorts of things – and really encouraging that sort of approach and making advice more accessible. That is something we are certainly doing at Quilter Cheviot – working hard there to try and make advice more accessible to our clients and clients beyond that. So that would be the positive outlook.

JM: It would be a beautiful world – I am signing up to your manifesto!

ME: And the downside is, I guess, the opposite – and we are perhaps nearer that, at the moment, than we are to the positive side in the UK. You know, the tax system is pretty complicated and regulations don’t necessarily encourage people to save for themselves. So that would be the challenge, I suppose, and that is the challenge to us as a business at Quilter Cheviot – to really try and to move that forward and encourage people to invest.

Back in time

JM: Well, if you find a way, do let me know – and I will do the same. What else have we got? What advice would you have given your younger self on your first day in the job?

ME: I suppose it would be some of the stuff we have talked about – certainly around investing early as a youngster. That is one mistake pretty much everyone makes as there are always a lot of other things you can spend your money on. You don’t necessarily have that much when you’re younger either and you grow up and have a family and buy a house – so there are always other things to think about.

But, even if it’s just a small amount, on day one, just invest some capital and do it regularly. Put it into a tracker or whatever it may be and just leave it there and, with a fair wind, over a 30 or 40-year career or however long it might be, it should be quite a substantial sum at the end. If I had my time again, that is what I would have done.

JM: Fair enough. When I edited a consumer finance magazine in the 2000s, every November we would run a cover story on ‘How to retire early’ with all the usual good advice – except the real answer would have started, ‘First build a time machine and go back 30 years …!’

Active fun management

JM: Now, we call this ‘Choice Words’ so let’s get some personal recommendations. One of them, ideally, would be a book – which may or may not be investment-related – and the other one is a free choice. And believe me, we have had some very free choices over the last few months! So what would be your two?

ME: For a book, if I was to go down the financial route, I’d probably say The Power Law by Sebastian Mallaby. It is all about venture capital and its history, which may not sound particularly exciting, but it is written in a pretty accessible way and it is brought to life by engaging with the characters who have been in the industry from, as I said, 30 or 40 years ago, right up to the current day.

You know, it talks about Elon Musk and Peter Thiel and all these guys who have been successful and then it also talk about some of the businesses that have done phenomenally well – you know, the Amazons and the Apples and so on – along with some of the failures. So it is a really accessible, interesting and engaging way to learn about the venture capital world.

In terms of a free hit, let me go for a sport I have got into quite recently, actually, called ‘SwimRun’. It is sort of what the name suggests but, if you were to try and describe it, it is like triathlon – only without the bike and without the transition. So you turn up, put on your wetsuit, swim hat, goggles and trainers and then there is a course – usually of about five miles but it can be 30 or 40 miles.

And you are in and out of lakes and running around mountains and hills. It is really friendly, it is a pretty nascent but growing sport and it takes you to all the beautiful parts of the UK – North Wales, the Lake District, Scotland. So really nice weekends away, really good fun, gets you out in the wild – and, yes, really enjoyable.

JM: That is a good recommendation though, personally, I think I am more likely to seek out the book! But that is fantastic – great recommendations – and, Matt, thank you so much for talking to us.

ME: It has been a pleasure – thank you.

JM: And thank you very much for watching.

Please do look out for further Choice Words episodes as they are published